JAEGIS Quality Assurance Standards Implementation
Quality Assurance Overview
The Quality Assurance Standards Implementation provides comprehensive quality validation, professional standards compliance, and continuous quality improvement throughout the full team participation workflow. It ensures all agent contributions meet industry-leading quality standards.
Core Quality Framework
1. Meaningful Contribution Standards
Agent-Specific Quality Criteria
class MeaningfulContributionStandards:
"""Define meaningful contribution standards for each agent"""
def __init__(self):
self.agent_standards = self.load_agent_specific_standards()
self.quality_thresholds = self.load_quality_thresholds()
self.validation_framework = self.load_validation_framework()
def load_agent_specific_standards(self):
"""Load detailed quality standards for each agent"""
return {
"John": { # Product Manager
"contribution_types": [
"business_impact_assessment",
"stakeholder_perspective",
"requirements_validation",
"user_value_analysis",
"market_feasibility_review"
],
"quality_criteria": {
"business_insight_depth": {
"minimum_score": 8.0,
"validation_method": "stakeholder_value_assessment",
"required_elements": [
"quantifiable_business_impact",
"stakeholder_alignment_evidence",
"market_validation_data",
"roi_justification"
]
},
"actionability": {
"minimum_score": 8.5,
"validation_method": "implementation_feasibility_check",
"required_elements": [
"specific_action_items",
"measurable_outcomes",
"timeline_considerations",
"resource_requirements"
]
},
"professional_standards": {
"minimum_score": 9.0,
"validation_method": "industry_best_practices_compliance",
"required_elements": [
"industry_standard_terminology",
"professional_documentation_format",
"evidence_based_recommendations",
"risk_assessment_inclusion"
]
}
},
"minimum_contribution_requirement": "Must provide business perspective on at least 2 workflow aspects with quantifiable impact analysis",
"quality_validation_checklist": [
"Business value clearly articulated",
"Stakeholder impact assessed",
"Market feasibility validated",
"Implementation roadmap provided",
"Success metrics defined"
]
},
"Fred": { # System Architect
"contribution_types": [
"technical_feasibility_assessment",
"system_integration_analysis",
"architecture_validation",
"scalability_review",
"technology_stack_evaluation"
],
"quality_criteria": {
"technical_depth": {
"minimum_score": 9.0,
"validation_method": "technical_accuracy_assessment",
"required_elements": [
"detailed_technical_analysis",
"architecture_pattern_justification",
"scalability_considerations",
"integration_complexity_assessment"
]
},
"implementation_feasibility": {
"minimum_score": 8.5,
"validation_method": "development_team_validation",
"required_elements": [
"implementation_approach_clarity",
"technical_constraint_identification",
"resource_requirement_estimation",
"timeline_feasibility_assessment"
]
},
"industry_standards_compliance": {
"minimum_score": 9.0,
"validation_method": "standards_compliance_check",
"required_elements": [
"industry_best_practices_adherence",
"security_standards_compliance",
"performance_standards_consideration",
"maintainability_standards_inclusion"
]
}
},
"minimum_contribution_requirement": "Must validate technical architecture and provide comprehensive scalability assessment with implementation roadmap",
"quality_validation_checklist": [
"Technical architecture validated",
"Scalability approach defined",
"Integration strategy provided",
"Performance considerations addressed",
"Security implications assessed"
]
},
"Tyler": { # Task Breakdown Specialist
"contribution_types": [
"implementation_planning",
"task_sequencing",
"acceptance_criteria_definition",
"resource_estimation",
"milestone_planning"
],
"quality_criteria": {
"planning_completeness": {
"minimum_score": 8.5,
"validation_method": "implementation_coverage_assessment",
"required_elements": [
"comprehensive_task_breakdown",
"clear_acceptance_criteria",
"dependency_identification",
"resource_allocation_planning"
]
},
"actionability": {
"minimum_score": 9.0,
"validation_method": "developer_readiness_check",
"required_elements": [
"immediately_actionable_tasks",
"clear_definition_of_done",
"testable_acceptance_criteria",
"measurable_completion_criteria"
]
},
"project_management_standards": {
"minimum_score": 8.5,
"validation_method": "pm_methodology_compliance",
"required_elements": [
"agile_methodology_alignment",
"risk_identification_inclusion",
"timeline_estimation_accuracy",
"quality_gate_definition"
]
}
},
"minimum_contribution_requirement": "Must break down work into actionable tasks with clear, testable acceptance criteria and realistic estimates",
"quality_validation_checklist": [
"Tasks are immediately actionable",
"Acceptance criteria are testable",
"Dependencies are identified",
"Estimates are realistic",
"Quality gates are defined"
]
},
# Continue with secondary agents...
"Jane": { # Design Architect
"contribution_types": [
"user_experience_perspective",
"interface_considerations",
"design_system_compliance",
"accessibility_review",
"frontend_architecture_validation"
],
"quality_criteria": {
"ux_expertise_depth": {
"minimum_score": 8.5,
"validation_method": "ux_best_practices_assessment",
"required_elements": [
"user_centered_design_principles",
"accessibility_compliance_considerations",
"usability_optimization_recommendations",
"design_system_integration_guidance"
]
},
"implementation_feasibility": {
"minimum_score": 8.0,
"validation_method": "frontend_development_validation",
"required_elements": [
"technical_implementation_guidance",
"responsive_design_considerations",
"performance_optimization_recommendations",
"browser_compatibility_assessment"
]
},
"accessibility_standards": {
"minimum_score": 9.0,
"validation_method": "wcag_compliance_check",
"required_elements": [
"wcag_guidelines_adherence",
"inclusive_design_principles",
"assistive_technology_compatibility",
"accessibility_testing_recommendations"
]
}
},
"minimum_contribution_requirement": "Must provide UX perspective with accessibility compliance and implementation guidance",
"quality_validation_checklist": [
"User experience optimized",
"Accessibility standards met",
"Design system compliance ensured",
"Implementation guidance provided",
"Usability testing recommendations included"
]
}
# Additional agents follow similar pattern...
}2. Natural Integration Principles
Integration Quality Framework
3. Performance Optimization Standards
Workflow Efficiency Optimization
4. Professional Standards Compliance
Industry Standards Framework
5. Continuous Quality Improvement
Quality Feedback Loop
6. Quality Assurance Success Metrics
Comprehensive Quality KPIs
Implementation Status
โ Meaningful Contribution Standards: Comprehensive agent-specific quality criteria defined โ Natural Integration Principles: Value-driven integration validation framework โ Performance Optimization: Efficiency optimization while maintaining quality โ Professional Standards: Industry standards compliance validation โ Continuous Improvement: Quality feedback loop and improvement processes โ Success Metrics: Comprehensive quality KPIs and measurement framework
Next Steps: Update enhanced instructions documentation, validate complete quality assurance implementation, and integrate with full team participation system.
Last updated