JAEGIS Participation Manager System Implementation
System Overview
The Participation Manager System is the core component that orchestrates full team participation across all JAEGIS AI agents. It provides comprehensive tracking, coordination, and optimization of agent collaboration throughout workflow execution.
Core Components
1. Participation Manager Configuration
# Configuration loaded from agent-config.txt
full-team-participation:
enabled: true
default-mode: true
startup-notification: "π€ Full Team Participation: ACTIVE - All agents will collaborate for comprehensive project coverage"
participation-tracking: enabled
meaningful-contribution-required: true
quality-threshold: 7.0
integration-optimization: enabled
parallel-processing: enabled
performance-monitoring: enabled
participation-manager:
session-tracking: enabled
real-time-monitoring: true
contribution-validation: enabled
status-updates-interval: 5
quality-assessment: enabled
integration-scheduling: enabled
progress-reporting: enabled2. Agent Classification System
Primary Agents (Always Activated)
John (Product Manager): Business perspective and requirements validation
Fred (System Architect): Technical architecture and system design
Tyler (Task Breakdown Specialist): Project decomposition and planning
Secondary Agents (Full Team Participation)
Jane (Design Architect): UX/UI design and frontend architecture
Alex (Platform Engineer): Infrastructure and security assessment
James (Full Stack Developer): Implementation and code quality
Sage (Validation Specialist): Dependency and security validation
Dakota (Data Engineer): Data architecture and database design
Sentinel (QA Specialist): Testing strategy and quality assurance
DocQA (Technical Writer): Documentation and user guides
3. Participation Tracking Framework
Session Initialization
Contribution Tracking
4. Integration Point Management
Natural Integration Points by Workflow Phase
Documentation Mode Integration Points:
Project Analysis: All agents provide domain-specific analysis
Requirements Refinement: Multi-perspective requirements validation
Collaborative Planning: Cross-functional planning coordination
Document Generation: Domain expertise contribution to documents
Quality Validation: Comprehensive quality review by all agents
Full Development Mode Integration Points:
Planning Phase: Comprehensive project planning with all perspectives
Implementation Phase: Multi-agent implementation coordination
Testing Phase: Quality assurance and validation by relevant agents
Deployment Phase: Infrastructure and security validation
Documentation Phase: Comprehensive documentation creation
5. Quality Standards and Validation
Meaningful Contribution Criteria
Business Perspective (John):
Business impact assessment with stakeholder considerations
Market feasibility analysis and user value proposition
Requirements validation from business perspective
Minimum: 2 business insights with actionable recommendations
Technical Architecture (Fred):
Technical feasibility assessment with scalability considerations
System integration analysis and architecture validation
Technology stack evaluation with implementation roadmap
Minimum: Architecture validation with scalability assessment
Task Planning (Tyler):
Comprehensive task breakdown with clear acceptance criteria
Implementation sequencing with dependency management
Resource estimation and milestone planning
Minimum: Actionable task breakdown with measurable criteria
UX/Design (Jane):
User experience perspective with accessibility considerations
Interface design recommendations with usability validation
Design system compliance and frontend architecture
Minimum: UX recommendations with implementation guidance
Infrastructure (Alex):
Infrastructure requirements with security implications
Deployment strategy with operational considerations
Performance optimization and cost-effectiveness analysis
Minimum: Infrastructure assessment with security validation
Development (James):
Implementation feasibility with technical debt assessment
Code quality standards and development best practices
Integration complexity analysis with risk mitigation
Minimum: Implementation validation with quality standards
Validation (Sage):
Dependency validation with security compliance
Technology assessment with risk analysis
Current standards validation with compliance checking
Minimum: Comprehensive validation with security assessment
Data Architecture (Dakota):
Data architecture implications with privacy compliance
Database design with scalability and performance considerations
Data flow validation with storage optimization
Minimum: Data architecture assessment with privacy validation
Quality Assurance (Sentinel):
Testing strategy with comprehensive coverage
Quality standards definition with measurable metrics
Risk assessment with mitigation strategies
Minimum: Testing strategy with quality validation procedures
Documentation (DocQA):
Documentation requirements with accessibility standards
User guide considerations with clarity assessment
Content standards review with usability validation
Minimum: Documentation assessment with clarity recommendations
6. Performance Optimization
Parallel Processing Framework
Integration Scheduling
7. Real-Time Monitoring and Status Updates
Progress Monitoring
Status Display Format
8. Command Integration
Full Team Commands Implementation
/full_team_on: Enable full team participation with comprehensive agent list/full_team_off: Disable full team participation, revert to selective mode/full_team_status: Display detailed participation status and progress
Enhanced Existing Commands
/agent-list: Show all agents with participation status indicators/pre_select_agents: Include full team participation option/yoloand/full_yolo: Maintain full team collaboration in rapid mode
9. Success Metrics and KPIs
Participation Metrics
Participation Rate: Target 100% meaningful contribution from all agents
Quality Score: Average quality score β₯ 8.0 across all contributions
Integration Effectiveness: 95% of integration points utilized successfully
Performance Impact: < 20% increase in workflow execution time
Quality Metrics
Meaningful Contribution Rate: 95% of contributions meet meaningfulness criteria
Cross-Agent Validation: 100% of outputs validated by relevant domain experts
Professional Standards Compliance: 98% compliance with professional standards
User Satisfaction: 90% positive feedback on collaborative output quality
10. Error Handling and Recovery
Participation Issues
Insufficient Contributions: Provide specific improvement guidance
Agent Unavailability: Automatic fallback to selective mode
Quality Issues: Real-time feedback and correction opportunities
Performance Degradation: Dynamic optimization and load balancing
Recovery Procedures
Session Recovery: Preserve participation state across interruptions
Quality Recovery: Iterative improvement cycles for insufficient contributions
Performance Recovery: Automatic optimization when performance thresholds exceeded
Integration Recovery: Alternative integration paths when primary points fail
Implementation Status
β Configuration System: Full team participation settings added to agent-config.txt β Agent Classifications: All agents classified as PRIMARY or SECONDARY β Integration Points: Natural integration points defined for all agents β Quality Standards: Meaningful contribution criteria established β Participation Framework: Comprehensive tracking and validation system designed
Next Steps: Implement agent activation logic, build participation tracking system, create command system implementation, integrate with workflows, and validate complete system functionality.
Last updated