JAEGIS-METHOD-v1.0\jaegis-agent\templates\task-decomposition-plan

{{Project Name}} - Task Decomposition Plan Template

Generated with JAEGIS Enhanced Validation & Research

[[LLM: VALIDATION CHECKPOINT - Review shared context from task requirements and validate all decomposition criteria. Integrate web research findings for current task management standards and execution best practices.]]

Executive Summary

[[LLM: RESEARCH INTEGRATION - Include current task decomposition best practices and validated execution methodologies. All task plans must be supported by current project management standards and execution research.]]

Enhanced Template Overview

Template ID: task-decomposition-plan-enhanced Agent: Enhanced Chunky (Task Decomposition & Execution Specialist with Advanced Intelligence) Purpose: Comprehensive template for systematic task decomposition planning and execution strategy development with validation intelligence and research-backed methodologies Version: 3.0 Enhanced Last Updated: July 23, 2025 - Enhanced with Validation Intelligence Context7 Integration: Enhanced template optimized for Context7 research integration and adaptive planning methodologies with validation capabilities

[[LLM: VALIDATION CHECKPOINT - All task decomposition plans must be validated for completeness, feasibility, and current project management standards. Include research-backed task management methodologies and execution principles.]]

---

Task Decomposition Plan: [PROJECT_NAME]

Executive Summary

Project ID: [PROJECT_ID] Project Name: [PROJECT_NAME] Decomposition Date: [CURRENT_DATE] Lead Agent: Chunky (Task Decomposition & Execution Specialist) Estimated Duration: [TOTAL_DURATION] Complexity Level: [COMPLEXITY_LEVEL] Resource Requirements: [RESOURCE_SUMMARY]

Project Overview

[Provide a comprehensive overview of the project, its objectives, scope, and strategic importance. Include key stakeholders, business value, and success criteria.]

Decomposition Rationale

[Explain why task decomposition is necessary, the complexity factors that triggered decomposition, and the expected benefits of the systematic approach.]

Key Success Factors

• [Success Factor 1]

• [Success Factor 2]

• [Success Factor 3]

• [Additional factors as needed]

---

Task Complexity Assessment

Complexity Analysis Matrix

Dimension	Score (1-10)	Rationale	Impact
Technical Complexity	[SCORE]	[RATIONALE]	[IMPACT]
Resource Requirements	[SCORE]	[RATIONALE]	[IMPACT]
Timeline Constraints	[SCORE]	[RATIONALE]	[IMPACT]
Stakeholder Complexity	[SCORE]	[RATIONALE]	[IMPACT]
Integration Complexity	[SCORE]	[RATIONALE]	[IMPACT]
Risk Level	[SCORE]	[RATIONALE]	[IMPACT]
Quality Requirements	[SCORE]	[RATIONALE]	[IMPACT]
Dependency Complexity	[SCORE]	[RATIONALE]	[IMPACT]

Overall Complexity Score: [TOTAL_SCORE]/80 Complexity Classification: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]

Decomposition Triggers

• Single-Agent Capacity Exceeded: Task exceeds capacity of any single JAEGIS agent

• Multi-Domain Expertise Required: Task requires expertise from multiple specialized domains

• Resource Coordination Needed: Task requires coordination of multiple resources and systems

• Timeline Optimization Required: Task timeline can be optimized through parallel execution

• Risk Mitigation Necessary: Task risks require systematic decomposition and mitigation

• Quality Assurance Critical: Task quality requirements necessitate systematic validation

• Stakeholder Coordination Complex: Multiple stakeholders require coordinated management

• Integration Challenges Present: Complex integration requirements need systematic approach

---

Systematic Task Decomposition

Decomposition Methodology

Selected Approach: [HIERARCHICAL/BOTTOM-UP/HYBRID] Decomposition Framework: [FRAMEWORK_NAME] Validation Method: [VALIDATION_APPROACH]

Level 1: Primary Task Components

[PROJECT_NAME]
├── Component 1: [COMPONENT_1_NAME]
│   ├── Estimated Duration: [DURATION]
│   ├── Resource Requirements: [RESOURCES]
│   ├── Assigned Agent(s): [AGENT_ASSIGNMENTS]
│   └── Dependencies: [DEPENDENCIES]
├── Component 2: [COMPONENT_2_NAME]
│   ├── Estimated Duration: [DURATION]
│   ├── Resource Requirements: [RESOURCES]
│   ├── Assigned Agent(s): [AGENT_ASSIGNMENTS]
│   └── Dependencies: [DEPENDENCIES]
└── Component N: [COMPONENT_N_NAME]
    ├── Estimated Duration: [DURATION]
    ├── Resource Requirements: [RESOURCES]
    ├── Assigned Agent(s): [AGENT_ASSIGNMENTS]
    └── Dependencies: [DEPENDENCIES]

Level 2: Task Chunk Breakdown

Component 1: [COMPONENT_1_NAME]

Chunk ID	Chunk Name	Duration	Agent	Dependencies	Priority	Quality Gates
C1.1	[CHUNK_NAME]	[DURATION]	[AGENT]	[DEPS]	[PRIORITY]	[GATES]
C1.2	[CHUNK_NAME]	[DURATION]	[AGENT]	[DEPS]	[PRIORITY]	[GATES]
C1.N	[CHUNK_NAME]	[DURATION]	[AGENT]	[DEPS]	[PRIORITY]	[GATES]

Component 2: [COMPONENT_2_NAME]

Chunk ID	Chunk Name	Duration	Agent	Dependencies	Priority	Quality Gates
C2.1	[CHUNK_NAME]	[DURATION]	[AGENT]	[DEPS]	[PRIORITY]	[GATES]
C2.2	[CHUNK_NAME]	[DURATION]	[AGENT]	[DEPS]	[PRIORITY]	[GATES]
C2.N	[CHUNK_NAME]	[DURATION]	[AGENT]	[DEPS]	[PRIORITY]	[GATES]

Level 3: Activity Breakdown (As Needed)

[Provide detailed activity breakdown for complex chunks that require further decomposition]

---

Agent Assignment Strategy

JAEGIS Agent Capability Matrix

Agent	Primary Expertise	Secondary Skills	Availability	Workload	Assignment Score
John (PM)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Fred (Architect)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Jane (Design)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Sage (Security)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Alex (Full-Stack)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Tyler (Task Breakdown)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Dakota (Dependencies)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Phoenix (Performance)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Chronos (Temporal)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
Sentinel (QA)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]
DocQA (Documentation)	[EXPERTISE]	[SKILLS]	[AVAILABILITY]	[WORKLOAD]	[SCORE]

Optimal Agent Assignments

Task Chunk	Primary Agent	Secondary Agent	Collaboration Type	Rationale
[CHUNK_ID]	[PRIMARY]	[SECONDARY]	[COLLABORATION]	[RATIONALE]
[CHUNK_ID]	[PRIMARY]	[SECONDARY]	[COLLABORATION]	[RATIONALE]
[CHUNK_ID]	[PRIMARY]	[SECONDARY]	[COLLABORATION]	[RATIONALE]

Workload Balancing Analysis

• Total Available Capacity: [CAPACITY_HOURS]

• Total Required Effort: [EFFORT_HOURS]

• Capacity Utilization: [UTILIZATION_PERCENTAGE]%

• Peak Load Period: [PEAK_PERIOD]

• Load Balancing Strategy: [STRATEGY]

---

Dependency Analysis & Critical Path

Dependency Matrix

Task Chunk	Depends On	Dependency Type	Impact Level	Mitigation Strategy
[CHUNK_ID]	[DEPENDENCIES]	[TYPE]	[IMPACT]	[MITIGATION]
[CHUNK_ID]	[DEPENDENCIES]	[TYPE]	[IMPACT]	[MITIGATION]
[CHUNK_ID]	[DEPENDENCIES]	[TYPE]	[IMPACT]	[MITIGATION]

Critical Path Analysis

Critical Path: [CHUNK_1] → [CHUNK_2] → [CHUNK_3] → [CHUNK_N]
Total Duration: [CRITICAL_PATH_DURATION]
Buffer Time: [BUFFER_TIME]
Risk Level: [RISK_LEVEL]

Parallel Execution Opportunities

Parallel Group	Task Chunks	Duration	Resource Requirements	Coordination Needs
Group 1	[CHUNKS]	[DURATION]	[RESOURCES]	[COORDINATION]
Group 2	[CHUNKS]	[DURATION]	[RESOURCES]	[COORDINATION]
Group N	[CHUNKS]	[DURATION]	[RESOURCES]	[COORDINATION]

---

Timeline & Milestone Planning

Project Timeline Overview

Phase	Start Date	End Date	Duration	Key Milestones	Deliverables
Phase 1	[START]	[END]	[DURATION]	[MILESTONES]	[DELIVERABLES]
Phase 2	[START]	[END]	[DURATION]	[MILESTONES]	[DELIVERABLES]
Phase N	[START]	[END]	[DURATION]	[MILESTONES]	[DELIVERABLES]

Detailed Milestone Schedule

Milestone	Target Date	Success Criteria	Validation Method	Responsible Agent	Status
[MILESTONE_1]	[DATE]	[CRITERIA]	[VALIDATION]	[AGENT]	[STATUS]
[MILESTONE_2]	[DATE]	[CRITERIA]	[VALIDATION]	[AGENT]	[STATUS]
[MILESTONE_N]	[DATE]	[CRITERIA]	[VALIDATION]	[AGENT]	[STATUS]

Buffer Management Strategy

• Total Buffer Allocation: [BUFFER_PERCENTAGE]% of total timeline

• Buffer Distribution: [DISTRIBUTION_STRATEGY]

• Buffer Utilization Triggers: [TRIGGERS]

• Buffer Reallocation Policy: [POLICY]

---

Risk Assessment & Mitigation

Risk Register

Risk ID	Risk Description	Probability	Impact	Risk Score	Mitigation Strategy	Owner	Status
R001	[RISK_DESCRIPTION]	[PROB]	[IMPACT]	[SCORE]	[MITIGATION]	[OWNER]	[STATUS]
R002	[RISK_DESCRIPTION]	[PROB]	[IMPACT]	[SCORE]	[MITIGATION]	[OWNER]	[STATUS]
R00N	[RISK_DESCRIPTION]	[PROB]	[IMPACT]	[SCORE]	[MITIGATION]	[OWNER]	[STATUS]

Contingency Plans

Scenario	Trigger Conditions	Response Actions	Resource Requirements	Recovery Time
[SCENARIO_1]	[TRIGGERS]	[ACTIONS]	[RESOURCES]	[TIME]
[SCENARIO_2]	[TRIGGERS]	[ACTIONS]	[RESOURCES]	[TIME]
[SCENARIO_N]	[TRIGGERS]	[ACTIONS]	[RESOURCES]	[TIME]

---

Quality Assurance Framework

Quality Gates & Checkpoints

Gate ID	Gate Name	Criteria	Validation Method	Responsible Agent	Success Threshold
QG001	[GATE_NAME]	[CRITERIA]	[VALIDATION]	[AGENT]	[THRESHOLD]
QG002	[GATE_NAME]	[CRITERIA]	[VALIDATION]	[AGENT]	[THRESHOLD]
QG00N	[GATE_NAME]	[CRITERIA]	[VALIDATION]	[AGENT]	[THRESHOLD]

Quality Metrics & KPIs

Metric	Target Value	Measurement Method	Frequency	Responsible Agent	Alert Threshold
[METRIC_1]	[TARGET]	[METHOD]	[FREQUENCY]	[AGENT]	[THRESHOLD]
[METRIC_2]	[TARGET]	[METHOD]	[FREQUENCY]	[AGENT]	[THRESHOLD]
[METRIC_N]	[TARGET]	[METHOD]	[FREQUENCY]	[AGENT]	[THRESHOLD]

---

Communication & Coordination Plan

Stakeholder Communication Matrix

Stakeholder	Role	Communication Frequency	Preferred Method	Information Needs	Escalation Path
[STAKEHOLDER_1]	[ROLE]	[FREQUENCY]	[METHOD]	[NEEDS]	[ESCALATION]
[STAKEHOLDER_2]	[ROLE]	[FREQUENCY]	[METHOD]	[NEEDS]	[ESCALATION]
[STAKEHOLDER_N]	[ROLE]	[FREQUENCY]	[METHOD]	[NEEDS]	[ESCALATION]

Agent Coordination Protocols

Coordination Type	Frequency	Method	Participants	Agenda Items	Documentation
Daily Sync	[FREQUENCY]	[METHOD]	[PARTICIPANTS]	[AGENDA]	[DOCS]
Weekly Review	[FREQUENCY]	[METHOD]	[PARTICIPANTS]	[AGENDA]	[DOCS]
Milestone Review	[FREQUENCY]	[METHOD]	[PARTICIPANTS]	[AGENDA]	[DOCS]

---

Success Metrics & Validation

Project Success Criteria

• Scope Completion: All defined task chunks completed successfully

• Quality Standards: All quality gates passed and standards met

• Timeline Adherence: Project completed within planned timeline (±[TOLERANCE]%)

• Resource Efficiency: Resource utilization within planned parameters

• Stakeholder Satisfaction: Stakeholder satisfaction score ≥ [TARGET_SCORE]

• Risk Mitigation: All identified risks successfully mitigated

• Knowledge Transfer: Complete knowledge transfer and documentation

Performance Metrics

Metric	Baseline	Target	Current	Status	Trend
Task Completion Rate	[BASELINE]	[TARGET]	[CURRENT]	[STATUS]	[TREND]
Quality Score	[BASELINE]	[TARGET]	[CURRENT]	[STATUS]	[TREND]
Timeline Adherence	[BASELINE]	[TARGET]	[CURRENT]	[STATUS]	[TREND]
Resource Efficiency	[BASELINE]	[TARGET]	[CURRENT]	[STATUS]	[TREND]
Stakeholder Satisfaction	[BASELINE]	[TARGET]	[CURRENT]	[STATUS]	[TREND]

---

Context7 Research Integration

Automated Research Queries

Task_Decomposition_Research:
  query: "task decomposition methodologies project management best practices [CURRENT_DATE]"
  focus: ["decomposition_strategies", "execution_optimization", "coordination_techniques"]
  
Resource_Optimization_Research:
  query: "resource allocation optimization multi-agent coordination [CURRENT_DATE]"
  focus: ["resource_strategies", "allocation_techniques", "coordination_optimization"]
  
Risk_Management_Research:
  query: "project risk management mitigation strategies task execution [CURRENT_DATE]"
  focus: ["risk_identification", "mitigation_techniques", "contingency_planning"]

Research Application Plan

• Methodology Enhancement: Apply researched methodologies to improve decomposition approach

• Optimization Integration: Integrate optimization techniques for improved efficiency

• Best Practice Adoption: Adopt industry best practices for enhanced execution

• Innovation Implementation: Implement innovative approaches and emerging technologies

---

Approval & Sign-off

Plan Approval

Role	Name	Signature	Date	Comments
Project Sponsor	[NAME]	[SIGNATURE]	[DATE]	[COMMENTS]
Technical Lead	[NAME]	[SIGNATURE]	[DATE]	[COMMENTS]
Quality Assurance	[NAME]	[SIGNATURE]	[DATE]	[COMMENTS]
Chunky Agent	Chunky	[SIGNATURE]	[DATE]	[COMMENTS]

Change Control

• Version Control: All changes to this plan must be versioned and approved

• Change Authority: Changes require approval from [CHANGE_AUTHORITY]

• Impact Assessment: All changes must include impact assessment on timeline, resources, and quality

• Communication: All approved changes must be communicated to all stakeholders

---

Document Control Template Version: 2.1 Created By: Chunky (Task Decomposition & Execution Specialist) Last Updated: July 13, 2025 Next Review: [REVIEW_DATE] Distribution: All JAEGIS agents, Project stakeholders, Quality assurance team