Enhanced Infrastructure Review with Assessment Intelligence
Purpose
Comprehensive infrastructure review with real-time validation and research integration
Review infrastructure with validated assessment methodologies and collaborative intelligence
Ensure infrastructure excellence with current best practices and security compliance
Integrate web research for current infrastructure review frameworks and optimization patterns
Provide validated infrastructure assessment with cross-team coordination and improvement strategies
Enhanced Capabilities
Infrastructure Assessment Intelligence
Review Validation: Real-time infrastructure review validation against current industry standards
Research Integration: Current infrastructure assessment best practices and optimization methodologies
Security Assessment: Comprehensive infrastructure security review and compliance validation
Performance Validation: Infrastructure performance analysis and optimization recommendations
Collaborative Intelligence
Shared Context Integration: Access to all infrastructure components and architectural requirements
Cross-Team Coordination: Seamless collaboration with architecture and operations teams
Quality Assurance: Professional-grade infrastructure review with validation reports
Research Integration: Current infrastructure management and optimization best practices
Inputs
Current infrastructure documentation
Monitoring and logging data
Recent incident reports
Cost and performance metrics
infrastructure-checklist.md(primary review framework)
Key Activities & Instructions
1. Confirm Interaction Mode
Ask the user: "How would you like to proceed with the infrastructure review? We can work: A. Incrementally (Default & Recommended): We'll work through each section of the checklist methodically, documenting findings for each item before moving to the next section. This provides a thorough review. B. "YOLO" Mode: I can perform a rapid assessment of all infrastructure components and present a comprehensive findings report. This is faster but may miss nuanced details."
Request the user to select their preferred mode and proceed accordingly.
2. Prepare for Review
Gather and organize current infrastructure documentation
Access monitoring and logging systems for operational data
Review recent incident reports for recurring issues
Collect cost and performance metrics
<critical_rule>Establish review scope and boundaries with the user before proceeding</critical_rule>
3. Conduct Systematic Review
If "Incremental Mode" was selected:
For each section of the infrastructure checklist:
a. Present Section Focus: Explain what aspects of infrastructure this section reviews
b. Work Through Items: Examine each checklist item against current infrastructure
c. Document Current State: Record how current implementation addresses or fails to address each item
d. Identify Gaps: Document improvement opportunities with specific recommendations
f. Section Summary: Provide an assessment summary before moving to the next section
If "YOLO Mode" was selected:
Rapidly assess all infrastructure components
Document key findings and improvement opportunities
Present a comprehensive review report
<important_note>After presenting the full review in YOLO mode, you MAY still offer the 'Advanced Reflective & Elicitation Options' menu for deeper investigation of specific areas with issues.</important_note>
4. Generate Findings Report
Summarize review findings by category (Security, Performance, Cost, Reliability, etc.)
Prioritize identified issues (Critical, High, Medium, Low)
Document recommendations with estimated effort and impact
Create an improvement roadmap with suggested timelines
Highlight cost optimization opportunities
5. JAEGIS Integration Assessment
Evaluate how current infrastructure supports other JAEGIS agents:
Development Support: Assess how infrastructure enables Frontend Dev (Mira), Backend Dev (Enrique), and Full Stack Dev workflows
Product Alignment: Verify infrastructure supports PRD requirements from Product Owner (Oli)
Architecture Compliance: Check if implementation follows Architect (Alphonse) decisions
Document any gaps in JAEGIS integration
6. Architectural Escalation Assessment
DevOps/Platform → Architect Escalation Review:
Evaluate review findings for issues requiring architectural intervention:
Technical Debt Escalation:
Identify infrastructure technical debt that impacts system architecture
Document technical debt items that require architectural redesign vs. operational fixes
Assess cumulative technical debt impact on system maintainability and scalability
Performance/Security Issue Escalation:
Identify performance bottlenecks that require architectural solutions (not just operational tuning)
Document security vulnerabilities that need architectural security pattern changes
Assess capacity and scalability issues requiring architectural scaling strategy revision
Technology Evolution Escalation:
Identify outdated technologies that need architectural migration planning
Document new technology opportunities that could improve system architecture
Assess technology compatibility issues requiring architectural integration strategy changes
Escalation Decision Matrix:
Critical Architectural Issues: Require immediate Architect Agent involvement for system redesign
Significant Architectural Concerns: Recommend Architect Agent review for potential architecture evolution
Operational Issues: Can be addressed through operational improvements without architectural changes
Unclear/Ambiguous Issues: When escalation level is uncertain, consult with user for guidance and decision
Document escalation recommendations with clear justification and impact assessment
<critical_rule>If escalation classification is unclear or ambiguous, HALT and ask user for guidance on appropriate escalation level and approach</critical_rule>
7. Present and Plan
Prepare an executive summary of key findings
Create detailed technical documentation for implementation teams
Develop an action plan for critical and high-priority items
Prepare Architectural Escalation Report (if applicable):
Document all findings requiring Architect Agent attention
Provide specific recommendations for architectural changes or reviews
Include impact assessment and priority levels for architectural work
Prepare escalation summary for Architect Agent collaboration
Schedule follow-up reviews for specific areas
<important_note>Present findings in a way that enables clear decision-making on next steps and escalation needs.</important_note>
8. Execute Escalation Protocol
If Critical Architectural Issues Identified:
Immediate Escalation to Architect Agent:
Present architectural escalation report with critical findings
Request architectural review and potential redesign for identified issues
Collaborate with Architect Agent on priority and timeline for architectural changes
Document escalation outcomes and planned architectural work
If Significant Architectural Concerns Identified:
Scheduled Architectural Review:
Prepare detailed technical findings for Architect Agent review
Request architectural assessment of identified concerns
Schedule collaborative planning session for potential architectural evolution
Document architectural recommendations and planned follow-up
If Only Operational Issues Identified:
Proceed with operational improvement planning without architectural escalation
Monitor for future architectural implications of operational changes
If Unclear/Ambiguous Escalation Needed:
User Consultation Required:
Present unclear findings and escalation options to user
Request user guidance on appropriate escalation level and approach
Document user decision and rationale for escalation approach
Proceed with user-directed escalation path
<critical_rule>All critical architectural escalations must be documented and acknowledged by Architect Agent before proceeding with implementation</critical_rule>
Output
A comprehensive infrastructure review report that includes:
Current state assessment for each infrastructure component
Prioritized findings with severity ratings
Detailed recommendations with effort/impact estimates
Cost optimization opportunities
JAEGIS integration assessment
Architectural escalation assessment with clear escalation recommendations
Action plan for critical improvements and architectural work
Escalation documentation for Architect Agent collaboration (if applicable)
Offer Advanced Self-Refinement & Elicitation Options
Present the user with the following list of 'Advanced Reflective, Elicitation & Brainstorming Actions'. Explain that these are optional steps to help ensure quality, explore alternatives, and deepen the understanding of the current section before finalizing it and moving on. The user can select an action by number, or choose to skip this and proceed to finalize the section.
"To ensure the quality of the current section: [Specific Section Name] and to ensure its robustness, explore alternatives, and consider all angles, I can perform any of the following actions. Please choose a number (8 to finalize and proceed):
Advanced Reflective, Elicitation & Brainstorming Actions I Can Take:
Root Cause Analysis & Pattern Recognition
Industry Best Practice Comparison
Future Scalability & Growth Impact Assessment
Security Vulnerability & Threat Model Analysis
Operational Efficiency & Automation Opportunities
Cost Structure Analysis & Optimization Strategy
Compliance & Governance Gap Assessment
Finalize this Section and Proceed.
After I perform the selected action, we can discuss the outcome and decide on any further revisions for this section."
REPEAT by Asking the user if they would like to perform another Reflective, Elicitation & Brainstorming Action UNTIL the user indicates it is time to proceed to the next section (or selects #8)
Last updated